Jameis winston autographs1/22/2024 On the off chance it can be proved that a player received a few $100 bills, it could result in a loss of eligibility for a game or two or even a season.You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browserĭoes signing Derek Carr make the New Orleans Saints a contender? It may trigger a suspension as a school investigates the claims and tries to prove something without a paper trail, as is likely Gurley's case. In the other, it's about signatures.Īsk yourself what probing authentication databases accomplishes. Except in one case we're talking about the theft of merchandise. It's raising a red flag and hoping someone will come forward. This all happened last season, too.ĭoing this for any reason besides showing NCAA hypocrisy is akin to matching stock records to sales records and alleging someone stole something, without any other hard evidence. Reporters start poking around in authentication databases in an effort to find other clusters of merchandise tied to other players, or fans of the suspended player do the same to show that other star players signed the same stuff. One disgruntled dealer alleges he paid for a player to sign some memorabilia that was then resold for a profit. What the Jameis story means Todd Gurley timelineĪutograph investigations then snowball. Out of an abundance of caution, compliance departments will investigate these allegations, lending legitimacy to a silly rule and the searches for autographed merchandise that rule leads to. Anyone can find a piece of certified merchandise and comb through the JSA database, incrementally counting up and down to find sequential signed items to raise suspicion about whether a player was paid to sign during a session. But looking suspicious isn't against any rules.Īnd this is the problem with a compulsion to dig up dirt that isn't actually dirt. That's left up in the air, in a wink-wink, nudge-nudge way.Ĭlusters of certified autographs may look suspicious. It does not tell you whether Winston was paid for them. It tells you there are a bunch of certified Winston autographs on the marketplace that have been authenticated. This tells you nothing about rules being broken. An additional search later on Monday revealed 600 more Winston autographs that had been authenticated and logged into the company's website verification system for a total of more than 950 autographs. This report boils down to the following paragraph:Ī cursory search on JSA's website found more than 340 certified Winston autographs. There's no proof these autographs were signed in sessions, even if it is " likely," nor is there any evidence Winston was paid for his signature. ESPN reported that clusters of authenticated Winston autographs may have been signed in sessions with a memorabilia dealer. The Winston investigation is even more ridiculous. That dealer offered no proof of money changing hands, but Georgia suspended Gurley, perhaps based on other evidence. A disgruntled autograph dealer shopped a video of the Georgia star allegedly signing items in a car. The Gurley investigation is well documented. Neither the case against Todd Gurley nor the report that Jameis Winston has signed a bunch of authenticated autographs have been proven to break any NCAA rules. For the second time in less than a week, an autograph scandal involving a potential Heisman candidate has popped up.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |